L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 832, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1268
This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 832 (L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 832, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1268 (cusc 1966).
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of battery-operated mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 231 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 Cust. Ct. 832, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-batlin-son-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1966.