Kuske v. Jevne
218 N.W. 93, 173 Minn. 584, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 1064
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a writ of attachment and the levy- thereunder.
On the showing made before the trial court there was dispute as to some of the facts, and the facts that were undisputed were such that different inferences and conclusions could reasonably be drawn therefrom. In that situation the rule announced in First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425, 116 N. W. 917, applies.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kuske v. Jevne, 218 N.W. 93, 173 Minn. 584, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 1064 (Mich. 1928).
218 N.W. 93 (Kuske v. Jevne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dannheim Development, Inc. v. Mogler
412 N.W.2d 398 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1987)
Hereford Farms Co., Inc. v. Lende
220 N.W. 435 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1928)