Hereford Farms Co., Inc. v. Lende

220 N.W. 435, 175 Minn. 614, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 955
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJuly 6, 1928
DocketNo. 26,739.
StatusPublished

This text of 220 N.W. 435 (Hereford Farms Co., Inc. v. Lende) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hereford Farms Co., Inc. v. Lende, 220 N.W. 435, 175 Minn. 614, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 955 (Mich. 1928).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from an order vacating and dissolving a writ of attachment and levy made pursuant thereto.

Writ was issued on the alleged ground that defendants were about to assign, secrete and dispose of their property with intent to hinder, delay and defraud their creditors. Levy was made on certain property of defendant Lende. Motion, supported by affidavits, was made by Lende to vacate the attachment and the levy made thereunder. Counter affidavits were interposed, as were also other affidavits by both parties. After a full hearing and argument the court made its order granting the motion.

The situation in this case brings it squarely within the rule announced in Kuske v. Jevne, 173 Minn. 584, 218 N. W. 99, following First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425, 116 N. W. 917.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuske v. Jevne
218 N.W. 93 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1928)
First State Bank v. Schatz
116 N.W. 917 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 N.W. 435, 175 Minn. 614, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hereford-farms-co-inc-v-lende-minn-1928.