Kuske v. Jevne
This text of 218 N.W. 93 (Kuske v. Jevne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a writ of attachment and the levy- thereunder.
On the showing made before the trial court there was dispute as to some of the facts, and the facts that were undisputed were such that different inferences and conclusions could reasonably be drawn therefrom. In that situation the rule announced in First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425, 116 N. W. 917, applies.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 N.W. 93, 173 Minn. 584, 1928 Minn. LEXIS 1064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuske-v-jevne-minn-1928.