Krasniqi v. United States
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 10 CR 464 (GHW) -against- JUDGMENT SAIMIR KRASNIQI and BRUNO KRASNIQI, Defendants. wn KX
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 8, 2022, Judge Gorenstein's thoughtful and well-reasoned report and recommendation is adopted in full. The petition is dismissed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The petitioners have not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, so the Court denies a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253; accordingly, case 21-cv-1753 1s closed. DATED: New York, New York July 18, 2022
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K. Mango Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Krasniqi v. United States (Krasniqi v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.