Kogel v. Trump

271 A.D.2d 890

This text of 271 A.D.2d 890 (Kogel v. Trump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kogel v. Trump, 271 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

This is an appeal from an order sustaining objections to certain questions, made on behalf of respondents on their examination before trial, denying plaintiffs’ motion to compel answers thereto and further directing that the examination be closed. Appeal dismissed, without costs. (Matter of Jackson v. B. L. T. Garment Co., 267 App. Div. 831.) The proper procedure on the part of appellants is to move at Special Term for an order reopening the examination for the purpose of permitting questions to be answered. The competency, relevancy, and materiality of the evidence should be reserved for determination upon the trial, (Kleinfleld v. Katz, 265 App. Div. 948; Antun, Inc., v. Viola, 235 App. Div. 816.) Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, j J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kleinfield v. Katz
265 A.D. 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Jackson v. B. L. T. Garment Co.
267 A.D. 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kogel-v-trump-nyappdiv-1946.