Jackson v. B. L. T. Garment Co.
This text of 267 A.D. 831 (Jackson v. B. L. T. Garment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by a third party from an order, made in the course of the examination of such third party in proceedings supplementary to judgment, which directed him to answer certain questions as to the business conducted by him. Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the order is not appealable. (Brown v. Cadmus Holding Corp., 238 App. Div. 867; Bernstock V. Paramount Beauty Shoppe, Inc., 257 App. Div. 1004; Le Blanc v. Duncan, 260 App. Div. 953.) Insofar as the decisions in Antun, Inc., v. Viola, Appeal No. iS (235 App. Div. 816), Cannon v. Otis Elevator Co. (265 App. Div. 944), and Kleinfleld v. Kate (265 App. Div. 948) are inconsistent herewith, they are overruled. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 831, 45 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-b-l-t-garment-co-nyappdiv-1944.