Kleinfield v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kleinfield v. Katz

265 A.D. 838, 37 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D. 838 (Kleinfield v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kleinfield v. Katz, 265 A.D. 838, 37 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from original order dated June 18, 1942, dismissed, without costs. The appeal of defendant Cohen from order dated July 21, 1942, granting in part plaintiffs’ motion for her examination before trial, is dismissed, without costs. Upon cross-appeal of plaintiffs from so much of the order dated July 21, 1942, as denied their motion to examine defendant Cohen as to items 2, 3, 4 and 5 in plaintiffs’ notice of motion, the order is modified on the law by striking out the first ordering paragraph and by inserting in lieu thereof the following: “Ordered that plaintiffs’ motion be and the same is hereby granted as to the items set forth in the notice of motion”. As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiffs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from original order dated June 18, 1942, dismissed, without costs. The appeal of defendant Cohen from order dated July 21, 1942, granting in part plaintiffs’ motion for her examination before trial, is dismissed, without costs. Upon cross-appeal of plaintiffs from so much of the order dated July 21, 1942, as denied their motion to examine defendant Cohen as to items 2, 3, 4 and 5 in plaintiffs’ notice of motion, the order is modified on the law by striking out the first ordering paragraph and by inserting in lieu thereof the following: “Ordered that plaintiffs’ motion be and the same is hereby granted as to the items set forth in the notice of motion”. As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiffs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D. 838, 37 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleinfield-v-katz-nyappdiv-1942.