Kleinfield v. Katz
265 A.D. 948, 38 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6686
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1942·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
In our opinion the questions to which objections were made were within the scope of said respondent’s examination as ordered by the court, and they are relevant to the issues. The competency and materiality of the evidence are matters to be determined by the trial court. (Antun, Inc., v. Viola, 235 App. Div. 816; Brown v. Bedell, 232 App. Div. 158; Guenther v. Ridgway Co., 159 App. Div. 74.) Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kleinfield v. Katz, 265 A.D. 948, 38 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 948 (Kleinfield v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Derico v. Pancrazio A. Sarubbi, Inc.
19 Misc. 2d 647 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Murphy v. New York Central Railroad
16 Misc. 2d 249 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Kogel v. Trump
271 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
In re the Probate of the Will of Caldwell
186 Misc. 60 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1945)