Knight v. State

114 So. 3d 1067, 2013 WL 2436420, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8933
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 1D11-0836·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, in what is clearly a scrivener’s error, the written judgment in case 09-00148 reflects a sentence of 15 years in prison followed by 15 years on probation for the offense of the burglary of a dwelling in count I. At sentencing, the trial court orally pronounced a sentence of 15 years in prison for this offense. Therefore, the written judgment must be corrected to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Turner v. State, 770 So.2d 1288, 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (affirming and remanding in an Anders appeal with instructions to conform the judgment to the oral pronouncement awarding credit for time served). Appellant need not be present for the correction of this clerical error.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED to correct the written sentence in case number [1068]*106809-00148 to reflect a 15-year prison sentence as to count I.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. State, 114 So. 3d 1067, 2013 WL 2436420, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8933 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

114 So. 3d 1067 (Knight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milena Alvarez v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Alvarez v. State
246 So. 3d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Mikhail Murray v. State of Florida
164 So. 3d 1251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Labrandon Bodison v. State of Florida
174 So. 3d 1011 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Douglas v. State
140 So. 3d 691 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)