Milena Alvarez v. State of Florida
This text of Milena Alvarez v. State of Florida (Milena Alvarez v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-2227 _____________________________
MILENA ALVAREZ,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. David Rimmer, Judge.
June 8, 2018
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges on appeal the revocation of her probation and the resulting judgment and sentence for the original offenses of organized fraud and fraudulent use of a credit card.
The order revoking probation is remanded for correction of a clerical error regarding admissions by Appellant. The corrected order should reflect that Appellant was found in willful violation of her probation for failure to pay restitution and costs as ordered, upon the evidence presented at the probation revocation hearing. Upon remand for this correction, Appellant need not be present. Knight v. State, 114 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). In all other respects, the judgment, sentence, and order on appeal are affirmed.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
WOLF, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Jason Cromey, Pensacola, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Milena Alvarez v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milena-alvarez-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.