Alvarez v. State

254 So. 3d 510
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alvarez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 So. 3d 625
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 2018·No. 17-1963·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 28, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-1963 Lower Tribunal No. 14-21972A ________________

Juan Alvarez, Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction—Petition for Belated Appeal.

Juan Alvarez, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before LAGOA, SCALES, and LUCK, JJ.

LAGOA, J.

The Petitioner, Juan Alvarez (“Alvarez”), filed a petition seeking a belated

appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). For the

following reasons, we deny the petition. On November 22, 2017, this Court appointed a commissioner to hold a

limited evidentiary hearing in order to determine whether Alvarez requested that

his counsel file an appeal from his plea and sentence. See Alvarez v. State, 230

So. 3d 625, 626 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). On December 21, 2017, the commissioner

held an evidentiary hearing where both Alvarez and his former counsel, Alejandro

Zamora (“Zamora”), testified. The State proceeded to file the Commissioner’s

Report from that hearing with this Court.

The commissioner made several factual findings. Specifically, the

commissioner found that “Defendant’s attorney, Mr. Zamora, took detailed notes

at the time of the plea” and that “Zamora credibly testified the Defendant did not

ask him to file an appeal nor was it referenced in his detailed notes.” The

commissioner further found that Alvarez was “not credible” and that various

statements he made during the evidentiary hearing were “in fact refuted by the

prior record,” including the Order of Probation as well as the February 10, 2017,

plea and sentencing hearing transcript. Based on these findings, the commissioner

found that Alvarez did not request for his attorney to file a direct appeal. We

accept the commissioner’s recommendation and deny Alvarez’s petition for

belated appeal. See Svoboda v. State, 932 So. 2d 545, 547 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarez v. State, 254 So. 3d 510 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

254 So. 3d 510 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Svoboda v. State
932 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Alvarez v. State
230 So. 3d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)