Kirland v. Stumph

73 Ind. 514
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1881
DocketNo. 7969
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 Ind. 514 (Kirland v. Stumph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirland v. Stumph, 73 Ind. 514 (Ind. 1881).

Opinion

Franklin, C.

— The appellant commenced three suits against appellees in the Superior Court of Marion County. They were consolidated, tried as one suit by the court, and judgment rendered for appellees.

An appeal was taken to the general term of said court, and by it the judgment at special term was in all things affirmed. An appeal was then taken to this court. ■

In this court, the appellant has assigned the same errors, and in the same manner, as he assigned them in the general term of the superior court, but has not assigned any error in the superior court at general term. Those errors have [515]*515.all been passed upon and decided by the superior court at general term; and that decision is final, unless it is complained of in this court. There being no error assigned on the action of the superior court at general term, there is no •question presented by the record for this court to decide.

Acts 1871, p. 48 ; Buskirk’s Practice, 129 and 131; Wesley v. Milford, 41 Ind. 413 ; Farman v. Ratcliff, 42 Ind. 537 ; Van Dusen v. Kindleburger, 44 Ind. 282 ; Linsman v. Huggins, 44 Ind. 474; The Indianapolis, etc., Union v. The Cleveland, etc., R. W. Co., 45 Ind. 281; Buser v. Blair, 47 Ind. 519 ; Munson v. Lock, 48 Ind. 116 ; Miller v. The State, ex rel. Harrington, 61 Ind. 503 ; The Indianapolis, etc., R. W. Co. v. Negley, 62 Ind. 178; McLaughlin v. Child, 62 Ind. 416.

Per Curiam.

— It is therefore ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, and the authorities therein cited, that the judgment below be, and is hereby, in all things affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKibben v. Moriarity
77 Ind. 600 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Ind. 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirland-v-stumph-ind-1881.