McKibben v. Moriarity
This text of 77 Ind. 600 (McKibben v. Moriarity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant appeals from a judgment of affirmance
at the general term of a judgment rendered at a special term of the superior court. The assignment of errors does not call in question the judgment of the general term, but the rulings at special term only. Such an assignment presents no question for the determination of this court. Buskirk Prac., p. 131, and cases there cited; Kirland v. Stumph, 73 Ind. 514. The judgment below should be affirmed.
Per Curiam. — It is therefore ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the judgment below be, and it is hereby, in all things affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Ind. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckibben-v-moriarity-ind-1881.