McKibben v. Moriarity

77 Ind. 600
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1881·No. No. 8242·Published

Opinion

Newcomb, C.

The appellant appeals from a judgment of affirmance

at the general term of a judgment rendered at a special term of the superior court. The assignment of errors does not call in question the judgment of the general term, but the rulings at special term only. Such an assignment presents no question for the determination of this court. Buskirk Prac., p. 131, and cases there cited; Kirland v. Stumph, 73 Ind. 514. The judgment below should be affirmed.

Per Curiam. — It is therefore ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the judgment below be, and it is hereby, in all things affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKibben v. Moriarity, 77 Ind. 600 (Ind. 1881).

77 Ind. 600 (McKibben v. Moriarity) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirland v. Stumph
73 Ind. 514 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)