Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley

62 Ind. 178
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Biddle, J.

This ease was tried at the special term, and a judgment rendered against the appellant.

An appeal was taken to the general term, wherein the judgment was affirmed. Appeal to this court. Yo error was assigned in the court below at the general term; there is, therefore, no question presented here. This practice is well settled.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley, 62 Ind. 178 (Ind. 1878).

62 Ind. 178 (Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirland v. Stumph
73 Ind. 514 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)