Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley
This text of 62 Ind. 178 (Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This ease was tried at the special term, and a judgment rendered against the appellant.
An appeal was taken to the general term, wherein the judgment was affirmed. Appeal to this court. Yo error was assigned in the court below at the general term; there is, therefore, no question presented here. This practice is well settled.
The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Ind. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indianapolis-peru-chicago-r-w-co-v-negley-ind-1878.