Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley
62 Ind. 178
Opinion
This ease was tried at the special term, and a judgment rendered against the appellant.
An appeal was taken to the general term, wherein the judgment was affirmed. Appeal to this court. Yo error was assigned in the court below at the general term; there is, therefore, no question presented here. This practice is well settled.
The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley, 62 Ind. 178 (Ind. 1878).
62 Ind. 178 (Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirland v. Stumph
73 Ind. 514 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)