Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.

181 L. Ed. 2d 1035, 132 S. Ct. 1307, 565 U.S. 1188, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 1074, 80 U.S.L.W. 3474, 2012 WL 516170
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 17, 2012
DocketNo. 10-1491
StatusPublished

This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 1035 (Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 181 L. Ed. 2d 1035, 132 S. Ct. 1307, 565 U.S. 1188, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 1074, 80 U.S.L.W. 3474, 2012 WL 516170 (U.S. 2012).

Opinion

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 1035, 132 S. Ct. 1307, 565 U.S. 1188, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 1074, 80 U.S.L.W. 3474, 2012 WL 516170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiobel-v-royal-dutch-petroleum-co-scotus-2012.