Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.

181 L. Ed. 2d 292, 132 S. Ct. 472, 565 U.S. 961, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7522, 80 U.S.L.W. 3237, 2011 WL 4905479
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 17, 2011·No. No. 10-1491·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Motion of International Law Scholars for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted, and case is to be argued in tandem with No. 11-88, Mohamad, Individually and for the Estate of Rahim, Deceased, et al. v. Palestinian Authority, et al., infra.

Same case below, 621 F.3d 111.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 181 L. Ed. 2d 292, 132 S. Ct. 472, 565 U.S. 961, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7522, 80 U.S.L.W. 3237, 2011 WL 4905479 (U.S. 2011).

181 L. Ed. 2d 292 (Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC
584 U.S. 241 (Supreme Court, 2018)
Jesner v. Arab Bank
Second Circuit, 2015
In Re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute Litigation
808 F.3d 144 (Second Circuit, 2015)
Mastafa v. Chevron Corp.
770 F.3d 170 (Second Circuit, 2014)
Jovic v. L-3 Services, Inc.
69 F. Supp. 3d 750 (N.D. Illinois, 2014)
Balintulo v. Daimler AG
727 F.3d 174 (Second Circuit, 2013)