King v. State
383 S.W.3d 20, 2012 WL 3955748, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 88 →
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Lenon King, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
[21]*21The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 383 S.W.3d 20, 2012 WL 3955748, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
383 S.W.3d 20 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.