King v. State
341 S.W.3d 737, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 684, 2011 WL 1877675
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 200 →
Opinion
ORDER
Jeremy King appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 341 S.W.3d 737, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 684, 2011 WL 1877675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
341 S.W.3d 737 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Etenburn v. State
341 S.W.3d 737 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)