King v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

King v. State

301 S.W.3d 591, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2010 WL 346258

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 2, 2010

DocketWD 69903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 301 S.W.3d 591 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 301 S.W.3d 591, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2010 WL 346258 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Matthew King appeals the judgment of the trial court following a jury trial committing him to the custody of the Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator. He claims that the trial court erred in failing to submit his offered Instruction No. G to the jury. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Matthew King appeals the judgment of the trial court following a jury trial committing him to the custody of the Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator. He claims that the trial court erred in failing to submit his offered Instruction No. G to the jury. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 S.W.3d 591, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2010 WL 346258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack