Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/King v. State

King v. State

669 So. 2d 350, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2350, 1996 WL 106568
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 622 So. 2d 134 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1996·No. No. 95-0934·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accept the state’s concession that the trial court erred when it failed to grant appellant’s request for an instruction on the offense of battery as a permissive, lesser included offense. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause for a new trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 669 So. 2d 350, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2350, 1996 WL 106568 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

669 So. 2d 350 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.