King v. State

656 So. 2d 269, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 1995 WL 366391
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 622 So. 2d 134
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1995·No. No. 94-3234·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of revocation of probation is affirmed but remanded to conform to the oral pronouncement of the trial court that the revocation was based on allegations 2, 3, and 4 of the amended affidavit and not on allegations 1, 2 and 3. A corrected order should be entered,

DELL, C.J., and WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 656 So. 2d 269, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 1995 WL 366391 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

656 So. 2d 269 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.