King v. State

618 So. 2d 740, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5075, 1993 WL 143930
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 7, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1485
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 618 So. 2d 740 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. State, 618 So. 2d 740, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5075, 1993 WL 143930 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

ALLEN, Judge.

The appellant’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed, except for the requirement that the appellant pay $500 as additional costs for participation in the Bay County Work Program as a condition of probation. This condition is stricken on the authority of Martin v. State, 618 So.2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (on motion for rehearing).

ZEHMER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanchette v. State
620 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Shudlick v. Shudlick
618 So. 2d 740 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
618 So. 2d 740, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5075, 1993 WL 143930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.