King v. State

267 So. 2d 351, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6134
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7175
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1972·No. No. 71-382·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against upon a charge of robbery but was convicted and sentenced of conspiracy to commit robbery. The appellant urges that conspiracy to commit robbery is not an offense included under a charge of robbery and therefore his conviction was void. Finchen v. State, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 749; Robinson v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 133 So.2d 310; see also Brown v. State, Fla. 1968, 206 So.2d 371.

We concur, and accordingly the conviction and sentence here under review are reversed with directions to discharge the appellant from custody. However, this reversal is without prejudice to the State to proceed with further action not inconsistent herewith. Finchen v. State, supra; Mackey v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 223 So.2d 380.

Reversed.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, TT., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 267 So. 2d 351, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

267 So. 2d 351 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell-Vaughn Ford, Inc. v. Rouse
206 So. 2d 371 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
Robinson v. Cochran
133 So. 2d 310 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Mackey v. State
223 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Kinchen v. State
235 So. 2d 749 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)