Mackey v. State
This text of 223 So. 2d 380 (Mackey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was informed against in the Criminal Court of Record upon the charge of robbery. He was convicted as an accessory after the fact. The State concedes with commendable candor1 that the conviction should be reversed upon the following authorities: Brown v. State, Fla. 1968, 206 So.2d 377; Douglas v. State, Fla. App.1968, 214 So.2d 653, but submits that the reversal of the conviction should be without prejudice to file a new information charging the appellant as an accessory. We concur and reverse the conviction and sentence here under review, with directions to discharge the appellant, which reversal is without prejudice to the State to proceed with further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. See: Newkirk v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 435 (opinion filed May 6, 1969).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 So. 2d 380, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackey-v-state-fladistctapp-1969.