King v. Milazzo
155 A.D.2d 1000
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1989·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant Hopkins further discovery. By demanding that plaintiffs file a note of issue defendant was no longer entitled to further deposition (see, CPLR 3216; Wolanin v Halliman, 145 AD2d 967, 968; Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp., 107 AD2d 1038). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — discovery.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Milazzo, 155 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
155 A.D.2d 1000 (King v. Milazzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Darko v. New York City Transit Authority
13 Misc. 3d 203 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Witmer v. Biehls
219 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
King v. Milazzo
155 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)