Wolanin v. Halliman

145 A.D.2d 967, 535 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14044
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 A.D.2d 967 (Wolanin v. Halliman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolanin v. Halliman, 145 A.D.2d 967, 535 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

— Order insofar as appealed from unani[968]*968mously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied, in accordance with the following memorandum: It was an improvident exercise of discretion for Special Term to grant defendants additional discovery and a physical examination of plaintiff (see, Siragusa v Teal’s Express, 96 AD2d 749). By demanding that plaintiff file a note of issue pursuant to CPLR 3216, defendants waived their right to have plaintiff examined and to obtain additional discovery (see, Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp., 107 AD2d 1038). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Milazzo
155 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 A.D.2d 967, 535 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolanin-v-halliman-nyappdiv-1988.