Killey v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

1926 OK 972, 250 P. 1021, 122 Okla. 102, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 211
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 7, 1926
Docket17892
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 1926 OK 972 (Killey v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Killey v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co., 1926 OK 972, 250 P. 1021, 122 Okla. 102, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 211 (Okla. 1926).

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

In tbis action the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, filed' its action in the district court of Muskogee county, against the defendants, constituting the excise board of Muskogee county, for injunctive relief as provided in State Question No'. 141, Initiative Petition No. 92, adopted by a vote of the people at the regular primary election held on August 3, 1926. To the petition the defendants med their demurrer, which was by the court overruled and defendants refused to plead further and elected' to stand upon their demurrer. The court entered judgment granting the plaintiff a permanent injunction against the defendants, from which order and judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The questions presented here are identical with the questions presented in cause No. 17907, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Ora Long, County Assessor, et al., the opinion in which was this day filed, 112 Okla. 86, 251 Pac. 486, and upon the authorities therein cited we reach the same conclusion in this case as'we reached in that, and the opinion, conclusion, and syllabus in that case are hereby adopted and applied to this ease, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

BRANSON, Y. C. J., and MASON. HARRISON, and CLARK, JJ., concur. NICHOLSON, O. J., and LESTER, J„ concur in conclusion. HUNT and RILEY, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Board of Educ.
1936 OK 632 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Henderson
1934 OK 55 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Sanders
1932 OK 38 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.
1931 OK 246 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Jones v. Blaine
1931 OK 17 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Stone v. Bonaparte
1930 OK 563 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Grubb v. Smiley
1929 OK 534 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Aaronson v. Smiley
1929 OK 522 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley
1929 OK 526 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.
279 P. 319 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Acme Milling Co. v. Bonaparte
1927 OK 138 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1926 OK 972, 250 P. 1021, 122 Okla. 102, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killey-v-st-louis-s-f-ry-co-okla-1926.