Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Long

1926 OK 976, 251 P. 486, 122 Okla. 86, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 205
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 7, 1926
Docket17923
StatusPublished
Cited by49 cases

This text of 1926 OK 976 (Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Long, 1926 OK 976, 251 P. 486, 122 Okla. 86, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 205 (Okla. 1926).

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

In this action the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company filed suit in the district court of Lincoln county against Ora Long, county assessor, and Paul Prince, county treasurer, of Lincoln county, for in-junctive relief as provided in State Question No. 141, Initiative Petition No. 92, adopted by a vote of the people at the regular primary election on August 3, 1926, which action was,, upon the motion of the defendants, dismissed by the district court upon the grounds that said measure was unconstitutional, from which judgment dismissing, the plaintiff appeals to this court.

The questions involved in this case are identical with the question involved in cause No. 17907, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Ora Long, County Assessor, et al., opinion in which was this day filed, 122 Okla. 86, 251 Pac. 486, and upon the authorities cited in cause No. 17907, we reach the same conclusion in this case as we reached 'in that, and the opinion, conclusion, and syllabus in that case are hereby adopted and applied to this case, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

BRANSON. V. C. J., MASON, HARRISION and CLARK, J.T., concur, NICHOLSON, O. J., and LESTER, .T„ concur in conclusion. HUNT and RILEY, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briggs v. Brown
400 P.3d 29 (California Supreme Court, 2017)
In Re Allcat Claims Service, L.P. and John Weakly
356 S.W.3d 455 (Texas Supreme Court, 2011)
Bushert v. Hughes
1996 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1996)
State v. Brown
1993 OK CIV APP 82 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1993)
Thomas v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety
1993 OK CIV APP 78 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1993)
Lepak v. McClain
1992 OK 166 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1992)
In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642
1992 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1992)
In re the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority
1989 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1989)
Wideman v. Garbarino
770 P.2d 320 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1989)
Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.
757 F.2d 557 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Clark v. State Election Board
1982 OK 102 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1982)
State v. Holmes
315 N.W.2d 703 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1982)
State Ex Rel. Emerald People's Utility District v. Joseph
640 P.2d 1011 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1982)
United States v. Brainer
515 F. Supp. 627 (D. Maryland, 1981)
Puckett v. Cook
1978 OK 108 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1978)
United States v. Howard
440 F. Supp. 1106 (D. Maryland, 1977)
Resolute Insurance v. Seventh Judicial District Court
336 F. Supp. 497 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1971)
Lindauer v. Allen
456 P.2d 851 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1926 OK 976, 251 P. 486, 122 Okla. 86, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-k-t-ry-co-v-long-okla-1926.