Keyse G. Jama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
This text of 362 F.3d 1117 (Keyse G. Jama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
JUDGMENT
The district court’s judgment ordering the release of petitioner under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is reversed because the district court erred in concluding that “there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.” See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001). The United States Supreme Court has granted certio-rari in Mr. Jama’s immigration case, and we believe that the Court will decide the case in a reasonable time and that it would be wrong to conclude that there is no significant likelihood that the government will prevail.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 F.3d 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keyse-g-jama-v-john-ashcroft-attorney-general-of-the-united-states-ca8-2004.