Zadvydas v. Davis
531 U.S. 1123, 121 S. Ct. 876
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 22, 2001
DocketNo. 99-7791; No. 00-38
StatusPublished
This text of 531 U.S. 1123 (Zadvydas v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zadvydas v. Davis, 531 U.S. 1123, 121 S. Ct. 876 (2001).
Opinion
C. A. 5th Cir. [Cer-tiorari granted, ante, p. 923]; and
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted sub nom. Reno v. Kim Ho Ma, ante, p. 924.] Motion of respondent Kim Ho Ma and petitioner Kestutis Zadvydas for additional time for oral argument and for divided argument granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
531 U.S. 1123, 121 S. Ct. 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zadvydas-v-davis-scotus-2001.