Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham
815 F.3d 1178, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3490, 2016 WL 762018
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2016
Docket13-17358
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 815 F.3d 1178 (Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham, 815 F.3d 1178, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3490, 2016 WL 762018 (9th Cir. 2016).
Opinion
D.C. No. 4:11-cv-02418-DMR.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham
844 F.3d 841 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
815 F.3d 1178, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3490, 2016 WL 762018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-marilley-v-charlton-bonham-ca9-2016.