Austin v. New Hampshire
419 U.S. 1103, 95 S. Ct. 772
This text of 419 U.S. 1103 (Austin v. New Hampshire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Austin v. New Hampshire, 419 U.S. 1103, 95 S. Ct. 772 (1975).
Opinion
Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. H. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 822.] Motion of appellees to permit Charles G. Cleaveland, Esquire, to present oral argument ;pro hue wee granted. Motions of Attorney General of Vermont and Attorney General of New Jersey for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
419 U.S. 1103, 95 S. Ct. 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-new-hampshire-scotus-1975.