Kentucky Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.

139 F.2d 266, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2259
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 7, 1943
Docket9564
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 139 F.2d 266 (Kentucky Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kentucky Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co., 139 F.2d 266, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2259 (6th Cir. 1943).

Opinions

McAllister, circuit judge.

The Kentucky Unemployment Compensation Commission filed its claim against a bankrupt estate for past-due unemployment contributions and penalty for nonpayment provided by state law. The referee denied allowance of the penalty, and his determination was sustained by the District Court. On appeal, the sole question is whether the claim, including the penalty, should have been allowed against the bankrupt estate. In the District Court, the Unemployment Compensation Commission contended: (1) that the penalty provided by state law was, in fact, interest; (2) that if the charge were considered a penalty within the intendment, it should be allowed against the bankrupt estate as a lien, created by statutory provisions of the State of Kentucky.

The District Court held that the charge was a penalty. The Legislature [267]*267used the term “penalty” to describe the charge; and the unpaid contributions were subject to the charge at the rate of one per cent per month, or fraction thereof, from and after the due date of the unemployment contribution, until payment was received by the Commission. The use of the term “penalty” in the statute, and the fact that the entire percentage of one per cent per month was charged for any fraction of a month, clearly indicates that the charge was a penalty, rather than interest. See People of State of New York v. Jersawit, 263 U.S. 493, 44 S.Ct. 167, 68 L.Ed. 405. With regard to the contention that the charge should be allowed against the bankrupt estate as a lien, the District Court made no disposition.

At the time the claim was filed, the statutes of Kentucky provided: “A lien on a parity with tax liens is hereby created in favor of the Commission upon all property both personal and real or rights thereto owned by any subject employer and used by him in connection with his trade, occupation, profession or business, from whom contributions, interest or penalties are or may hereafter become due. Such lien shall be for a sum equal to the amount at any time due from each subject employer to the Commission on account of contributions, interest and penalties thereon. Such lien shall commence from the time such contributions, interest or penalties become, or shall hereafter become, due. No action to enforce a lien under this section shall be brought after two years from the date of filing of such lien.” Acts 1940, c. 193, Baldwin’s Kentucky Statutes, 1941 Supp. 4748g-8.

In 1942, the foregoing section was amended to provide: Kentucky Revised Statutes, Sec. 341.310. “(1) A lien on a parity with tax liens is hereby created in favor of the Commission upon all property of any subject employer from whom contributions, interest or penalties are or may hereafter become due. This lien shall be for a sum equal to the amount at any time due from each subject employer to the commission on account of contributions, interest and penalties thereon. The lien shall commence from such time as the contributions, interest or penalties become due. No action to enforce a lien under this section shall be brought after two years after the date of filing the lien.”

Section 57, sub. j of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. 93, sub. j provides: “Debts owing to the United States or any State or subdivision thereof as a penalty or forfeiture shall not be allowed, except for the amount of the pecuniary loss sustained by the act, transaction, or proceeding out of which the penalty or forfeiture arose, with reasonable and actual costs occasioned thereby and such interest as may have accrued thereon according to law.”

While penalties, therefore, are not allowed in claims against bankrupt estates, the past due contributions and penalties, in this case, were supported by the lien provided by state statute. Statutory liens for taxes and debts owing to the United States or any state or subdivision thereof, created or recognized by the laws of the United States or any state, are valid against the trustee in bankruptcy. Title 11 U.S.C.A. § 107, sub. b. “It may be conceded that section 57j of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C.A. § 93(j), precludes the ‘allowance’ of a claim for penalties, but * * * adjudication in bankruptcy does not affect a valid and existing lien, consequently where a lien exists to support a penalty at the time of adjudication, section 57j does not come into operation.” In re Knox-Powell-Stockton Co., 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 979, 983.

The claim of appellant for the unpaid contributions and penalty, which by virtue of statute, became a lien, should have been allowed as filed. The order of the District Court is vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Satsky v. United States
993 F. Supp. 1027 (S.D. Texas, 1998)
In Re Churchfield
62 B.R. 399 (E.D. Michigan, 1986)
Simonson v. Granquist
369 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1962)
In re Tom's Villarosa, Inc.
198 F. Supp. 137 (D. Connecticut, 1961)
Steckler v. United States
195 F. Supp. 879 (S.D. Indiana, 1961)
Simonson v. Granquist
287 F.2d 489 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)
In re Mighell
168 F. Supp. 811 (D. Kansas, 1958)
In Re Parchem
166 F. Supp. 724 (D. Minnesota, 1958)
In re C. J. Dick Towing Co.
161 F. Supp. 751 (S.D. Texas, 1958)
In Re Lykens Hosiery Mills, Inc.
141 F. Supp. 895 (S.D. New York, 1956)
In Re John S. Goff, Inc.
141 F. Supp. 862 (D. Maine, 1955)
In Re Urmos
129 F. Supp. 298 (E.D. Michigan, 1955)
In Re Hankey Baking Company
125 F. Supp. 673 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1954)
Grimland v. United States
206 F.2d 599 (Tenth Circuit, 1953)
In Re Thrift Packing Co.
100 F. Supp. 907 (N.D. Texas, 1951)
In Re Burch
89 F. Supp. 249 (D. Kansas, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 F.2d 266, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kentucky-ex-rel-unemployment-compensation-commission-v-farmers-bank-ca6-1943.