Kent v. County of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Kent v. County of Hudson

251 A.2d 760, 53 N.J. 546, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 272

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 3, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 251 A.2d 760 (Kent v. County of Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kent v. County of Hudson, 251 A.2d 760, 53 N.J. 546, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 272 (N.J. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The Appellate Division reversed a judgment entered for the defendant on a jury verdict, 102 N. J. Super. 208 (1968). We granted defendant’s petition for certification, 53 N. J. 23 (1968). We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. The issue not having been raised, we express no view as to whether evidence of negligence exists in the present record.

For affirmance^—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Soiiettino and Haneman—7.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The Appellate Division reversed a judgment entered for the defendant on a jury verdict, 102 N. J. Super. 208 (1968). We granted defendant’s petition for certification, 53 N. J. 23 (1968). We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. The issue not having been raised, we express no view as to whether evidence of negligence exists in the present record.

For affirmance^—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Soiiettino and Haneman—7.

For reversal—Hone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.2d 760, 53 N.J. 546, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-county-of-hudson-nj-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack