Winters v. City of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Winters v. City of Jersey City

304 A.2d 196, 63 N.J. 7, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 158

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMay 7, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 304 A.2d 196 (Winters v. City of Jersey City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winters v. City of Jersey City, 304 A.2d 196, 63 N.J. 7, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 158 (N.J. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff William Winters, joined by his wife Alice Winters, sued to recover damages for injuries *8 suffered by him while a patient at the Jersey City Medical Center, a hospital owned and operated by the defendant City of Jersey City. The plaintiffs received jury awards against the City which aggregated $60,000, $45,000 for William and $15,000 for Alice. The trial judge reduced the aggregate to $10,000, $7,500 for William and $2,500 for Alice, on the basis of N. J. S. A. 2A:53A-8 which provides that a nonprofit corporation “organized exclusively for hospital purposes” shall not be liable to respond for its negligence beyond the sum of $10,000. On cross-appeals, the Appellate Division sustained the judgment of liability and also sustained the trial judge’s reduction of damages to $10,000. Judge Lynch concurred as to liability but dissented as to the reduction of damages. Winters v. City of Jersey City, 120 N. J. Super. 129, 135 (App. Div. 1972).

We agree with the Appellate Division’s opinion insofar as it rejected the defendant’s attack on the jury’s finding of liability as well as its attack on the jury’s measurement of damages. 120 N. J. Super. at 134-135; see Kent v. County of Hudson, 102 N. J. Super. 208, 224-225 (App. Div. 1968), aff'd, 53 N. J. 546 (1969); Cestero et al. v. Ferrara, 110 N. J. Super. 264 (App. Div. 1970), aff’d, 57 N. J. 497, 499 (1971). However, we are convinced that the Appellate Division erred in sustaining the trial court’s reduction of the jury’s awards to $10,000. We agree with the views expressed in the dissent (120 N. J. Super. at 135-154) and accordingly the judgment entered in the Appellate Division is:

Modified, with direction that judgment be entered pursuant to the jury’s awards of $45,000 in favor of William Winters and $15,000 in favor of Alice Winters.

For modification — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, and Sullivan, and Judges Con-eord and Lewis — 7.

Opposed — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff William Winters, joined by his wife Alice Winters, sued to recover damages for injuries *8 suffered by him while a patient at the Jersey City Medical Center, a hospital owned and operated by the defendant City of Jersey City. The plaintiffs received jury awards against the City which aggregated $60,000, $45,000 for William and $15,000 for Alice. The trial judge reduced the aggregate to $10,000, $7,500 for William and $2,500 for Alice, on the basis of N. J. S. A. 2A:53A-8 which provides that a nonprofit corporation “organized exclusively for hospital purposes” shall not be liable to respond for its negligence beyond the sum of $10,000. On cross-appeals, the Appellate Division sustained the judgment of liability and also sustained the trial judge’s reduction of damages to $10,000. Judge Lynch concurred as to liability but dissented as to the reduction of damages. Winters v. City of Jersey City, 120 N. J. Super. 129, 135 (App. Div. 1972).

We agree with the Appellate Division’s opinion insofar as it rejected the defendant’s attack on the jury’s finding of liability as well as its attack on the jury’s measurement of damages. 120 N. J. Super. at 134-135; see Kent v. County of Hudson, 102 N. J. Super. 208, 224-225 (App. Div. 1968), aff'd, 53 N. J. 546 (1969); Cestero et al. v. Ferrara, 110 N. J. Super. 264 (App. Div. 1970), aff’d, 57 N. J. 497, 499 (1971). However, we are convinced that the Appellate Division erred in sustaining the trial court’s reduction of the jury’s awards to $10,000. We agree with the views expressed in the dissent (120 N. J. Super. at 135-154) and accordingly the judgment entered in the Appellate Division is:

Modified, with direction that judgment be entered pursuant to the jury’s awards of $45,000 in favor of William Winters and $15,000 in favor of Alice Winters.

For modification — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, and Sullivan, and Judges Con-eord and Lewis — 7.

Opposed — Hone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.2d 196, 63 N.J. 7, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winters-v-city-of-jersey-city-nj-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack