Higgins v. American Society of Clinical Pathologists
This text of 251 A.2d 760 (Higgins v. American Society of Clinical Pathologists) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
This case is before us for the second time. On the plaintiff’s appeal we reversed the judgment of the Appellate Division in favor of the defendant and remanded the matter to the Law Division. 51 N. J. 191 (1968). On plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the defendant offered no proof in resistance. Accordingly, the proof stood as described in our opinion. Therefore, the trial court properly entered summary judgment for the plaintiff. We add that the line of proof suggested at the argument before us, that the plaintiff suffered no economic loss, is irrelevant.
Affirmed.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Har-eman-—6.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.2d 760, 53 N.J. 547, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-american-society-of-clinical-pathologists-nj-1969.