Kenneth B. Rainey v. Parkchester Condominiums, Inc.; Parkchester Police Department.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 9, 2026·No. 1:25-cv-01228·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KENNETH B. RAINEY, Plaintiff, 25 CIVIL 01228 (KMW) -against- PARKCHESTER CONDOMINIUMS, INC.; CIVIL JUDGMENT PARKCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT., Defendants.

For the reasons stated in the June 3, 2026, Order, Plaintiff's federal claims are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and the Court declines, under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of his state law claims. This decision does not limit Plaintiff's right to raise any of the arguments he may wish to raise in State court. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: June 9, 2026 New York, New York

/s/ Kimba M. Wood KIMBA M. WOOD United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenneth B. Rainey v. Parkchester Condominiums, Inc.; Parkchester Police Department., (S.D.N.Y. 2026).

Kenneth B. Rainey v. Parkchester Condominiums, Inc.; Parkchester Police Department. (Kenneth B. Rainey v. Parkchester Condominiums, Inc.; Parkchester Police Department.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)