FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 119

Recovery of civil damages authorized

18 U.S.C. § 2520
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter119 — WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Recovery of civil damages authorized) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2520.

Text

(a)In General.—Except as provided in section 2511(2)(a)(ii), any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of this chapter may in a civil action recover from the person or entity, other than the United States, which engaged in that violation such relief as may be appropriate.
(b)Relief.—In an action under this section, appropriate relief includes—
(1)such preliminary and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate;
(2)damages under subsection (c) and punitive damages in appropriate cases; and
(3)a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
(c)Computation of Damages.—
(1)In an action under this section, if the conduct in violation of this chapter is the private viewi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartnicki v. Vopper
200 F.3d 109 (Third Circuit, 1999)
90 case citations
Quigley v. Rosenthal
327 F.3d 1044 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
55 case citations
Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.
655 A.2d 1 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1995)
53 case citations
Glazner v. Glazner
347 F.3d 1212 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
33 case citations
Rufus Lee Smith v. The Cincinnati Post & Times-Star
475 F.2d 740 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
32 case citations
Sanders v. Robert Bosch Corp.
38 F.3d 736 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
23 case citations
Pichler v. UNITE
228 F.R.D. 230 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2005)
21 case citations
Chandler v. United States Army
125 F.3d 1296 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
17 case citations
Brown v. Waddell
50 F.3d 285 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
16 case citations
Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. v. Obama
705 F.3d 845 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
16 case citations
Valentine v. WideOpen West Finance, LLC
288 F.R.D. 407 (N.D. Illinois, 2012)
16 case citations
City of South Bend v. South Bend Common Council
865 F.3d 889 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)
12 case citations
Kinoy v. Mitchell
331 F. Supp. 379 (S.D. New York, 1971)
11 case citations
Robert Allen Tribble, Jr. v. Stephanie Tew
653 F. App'x 666 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
9 case citations
United States v. Local 1804-1, International Longshoremen's Ass'n
831 F. Supp. 177 (S.D. New York, 1993)
4 case citations
McCarty v. Bankers Insurance
195 F.R.D. 39 (N.D. Florida, 1998)
4 case citations
Cross v. Alabama, State Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation
49 F.3d 1490 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
3 case citations
In Re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation
700 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (N.D. California, 2010)
3 case citations
Blake v. Wright
179 F.3d 1002 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title III, §802, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 223; amended Pub. L. 91–358, title II, §211(c), July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 654; Pub. L. 99–508, title I, §103, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1853; Pub. L. 107–56, title II, §223(a), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 293; Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, §2207(e), formerly title II, §225(e), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2157, renumbered §2207(e), Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(I), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178; Pub. L. 115–141, div. V, §104(1)(B), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1216.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2018—Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 115–141 amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (3) read as follows: "a good faith determination that section 2511(3) or 2511(2)(i) of this title permitted the conduct complained of;".
2002—Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 107–296 inserted "or 2511(2)(i)" after "2511(3)".
2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–56, §223(a)(1), inserted ", other than the United States," after "person or entity".
Subsecs. (f), (g). Pub. L. 107–56, §223(a)(2), (3), added subsecs. (f) and (g).
1986—Pub. L. 99–508 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "Any person whose wire or oral communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of this chapter shall (1) have a civil cause of action against any person who intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose, or use such communications, and (2) be entitled to recover from any such person—
"(a) actual damages but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is higher;
"(b) punitive damages; and
"(c) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
A good faith reliance on a court order or legislative authorization shall constitute a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this chapter or under any other law."
1970—Pub. L. 91–358 substituted provisions that a good faith reliance on a court order or legislative authorization constitute a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this chapter or under any other law, for provisions that a good faith reliance on a court order or on the provisions of section 2518(7) of this chapter constitute a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this chapter.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 99–508 effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, and, in case of conduct pursuant to court order or extension, applicable only with respect to court orders and extensions made after such date, with special rule for State authorizations of interceptions, see section 111 of Pub. L. 99–508, set out as a note under section 2510 of this title.

Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–358 effective on first day of seventh calendar month which begins after July 29, 1970, see section 901(a) of Pub. L. 91–358.

Rule of Construction
Pub. L. 115–141, div. V, §106, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1224, provided that: "Nothing in this division [see section 101 of Pub. L. 115–141, set out as a Short Title of 2018 Amendment note under section 1 of this title], or the amendments made by this division, shall be construed to preclude any foreign authority from obtaining assistance in a criminal investigation or prosecution pursuant to section 3512 of title 18, United States Code, section 1782 of title 28, United States Code, or as otherwise provided by law."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2520.