Kennedy v. State

599 S.E.2d 290, 267 Ga. App. 314, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1678, 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 628
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 7, 2004
DocketA04A0374
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 599 S.E.2d 290 (Kennedy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennedy v. State, 599 S.E.2d 290, 267 Ga. App. 314, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1678, 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 628 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Adams, Judge.

Geraldine Kennedy pled guilty to the offenses of driving under the influence, driving with an unlawful alcohol concentration, and failure to maintain lane. Kennedy later moved, pro se, to withdraw her guilty plea and requested that an attorney be appointed to represent her because she was indigent. The trial court held a hearing on Kennedy’s motion to withdraw, but he did not appoint an attorney to represent her or inform her of her right to counsel. Following the hearing, the trial court denied the motion to withdraw the guilty plea, and this appeal followed.

Kennedy contends, and the State agrees, that this case is controlled by Fortson v. State, 272 Ga. 457 (532 SE2d 102) (2000), and that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to inform Kennedy of her right to representation at the hearing on her motion to withdraw her guilty plea, by failing to address her previous request for appointment of counsel, and by failing to ascertain whether she waived her right to counsel.

In Fortson our Supreme Court held that a proceeding to withdraw a guilty plea is a critical stage of a criminal prosecution, and “the right to counsel attaches when a defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea, thus entitling that defendant to assistance of counsel.” Id. at 460 (1). Thus, the Court reasoned, the trial court must inform the defendant of the right to counsel and ascertain whether that right has been waived. Id. See also Murray v. State, 265 Ga. App. 119 (592 SE2d 898) (2004). The Court in Fortson also rejected application of the harmless error analysis, being “instead persuaded by those majority *315 of cases holding that reversal and remand is the appropriate remedy for violations of this constitutional right. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case to the trial court for a re-hearing on [Kennedy’s] motion to withdraw [her] guilty plea [said hearing] tobe conducted in conformity with [the] opinion [in Fortson].” Fortson, 272 Ga. at 461 (2).

Decided May 7, 2004. Carnesale & Delan, Charles C. Flinn, for appellant. Geraldine Kennedy, pro se. Gwendolyn R. Keyes, Solicitor-General, Sandra F. Lekan, Assistant Solicitor-General, for appellee.

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

Ruffin, R J., and Eldridge, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Markel Owens v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016
Owens v. State
782 S.E.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)
Durham v. the State
764 S.E.2d 898 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Troy Douglas v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Douglas v. State
731 S.E.2d 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Ford v. State
717 S.E.2d 676 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Leonard v. State
668 S.E.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Johnson v. State
614 S.E.2d 477 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 S.E.2d 290, 267 Ga. App. 314, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1678, 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-state-gactapp-2004.