Troy Douglas v. State
This text of Troy Douglas v. State (Troy Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., ADAMS and MCFADDEN, JJ.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
August 14, 2012
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A12A1263. DOUGLAS v. THE STATE.
MCFADDEN, Judge.
Troy Douglas appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to
possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Because, as the state concedes, the
record does not reflect that Douglas knowingly waived his right to counsel during the
plea withdrawal proceedings, we reverse the order denying his motion and remand
the case for further proceedings.
Douglas was represented by counsel when he entered his guilty plea. Twenty-
four days later, he filed a pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea, asserting that he
had received ineffective assistance of counsel. Without addressing the merits of
Douglas’s motion, the trial court denied the motion on the ground that Douglas -- who was proceeding pro se and was presumably incarcerated at the time -- failed to
appear at the hearing. Douglas appealed.
1. In Fortson v. State, 272 Ga. 457 (532 SE2d 102) (2000), the Georgia
Supreme Court held that a proceeding to withdraw a guilty plea is a critical stage of
a criminal prosecution, id. at 459 (1), and that “the right to counsel attaches when a
defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea, thus entitling that defendant to assistance
of counsel.” Id. at 460 (1). The court further held that the trial court has an obligation
to provide counsel or to obtain a constitutionally valid waiver of counsel from a
defendant who seeks to withdraw his guilty plea. Id. at 459 (1).
Because [Douglas] was not appointed counsel for his motion to withdraw his plea, the record does not reveal that the court informed him of his right to counsel, and no waiver of counsel appears in the record, “we reverse and remand this case to the trial court for a re-hearing on [Douglas’s] motion to withdraw his guilty plea to be conducted in conformity with this opinion.” Fortson, supra, 272 Ga. at 461 (2); Kennedy v. State, 267 Ga. App. 314, 314-315 (599 SE2d 290) (2004).
Ford v. State, 312 Ga. App. 80, 81 (1) (717 SE2d 676) (2011).
2. Douglas’s remaining enumerations of error are rendered moot by our
holding in Division 1. Ford, 312 Ga. App. at 81 (2).
Judgment reversed and case remanded. Barnes, P. J., and Adams, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Troy Douglas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/troy-douglas-v-state-gactapp-2012.