Kelsey v. Sargent

1 Silv. Ct. App. 325, 5 N.Y. St. Rep. 616
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kelsey v. Sargent. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 N.Y. 602
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 25, 1887·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment rendered at special term made a reference necessary, therefore it was not final, but interlocutory. Barker v. White, 58 N. Y. 204.

[326]*326An appeal, however, was taken to the general term, and upon exceptions the defendant also moved that court for a new trial under section 1001 of the Code. The judgment was affirmed and the motion for a new trial denied. One order embraced both decisions, and from the whole of that order the defendant appealed.

So far as the appeal affects the order denying a new trial, it was well taken (§ 190, subd. 2; Raynor v. Raynor, 94 N. Y. 248, 251), and as the motion to dismiss relates to the whole appeal, and not a part only, it should be denied, and as the plaintiff asks for too much, he should pay costs.

Motion denied, with $10 costs.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelsey v. Sargent, 1 Silv. Ct. App. 325, 5 N.Y. St. Rep. 616 (N.Y. 1887).

1 Silv. Ct. App. 325 (Kelsey v. Sargent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barker v. . White
58 N.Y. 204 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)
Raynor v. . Raynor
94 N.Y. 248 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)