Kelsey v. Sargent

1 Silv. Ct. App. 325, 5 N.Y. St. Rep. 616
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 25, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Silv. Ct. App. 325 (Kelsey v. Sargent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelsey v. Sargent, 1 Silv. Ct. App. 325, 5 N.Y. St. Rep. 616 (N.Y. 1887).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment rendered at special term made a reference necessary, therefore it was not final, but interlocutory. Barker v. White, 58 N. Y. 204.

[326]*326An appeal, however, was taken to the general term, and upon exceptions the defendant also moved that court for a new trial under section 1001 of the Code. The judgment was affirmed and the motion for a new trial denied. One order embraced both decisions, and from the whole of that order the defendant appealed.

So far as the appeal affects the order denying a new trial, it was well taken (§ 190, subd. 2; Raynor v. Raynor, 94 N. Y. 248, 251), and as the motion to dismiss relates to the whole appeal, and not a part only, it should be denied, and as the plaintiff asks for too much, he should pay costs.

Motion denied, with $10 costs.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barker v. . White
58 N.Y. 204 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)
Raynor v. . Raynor
94 N.Y. 248 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Silv. Ct. App. 325, 5 N.Y. St. Rep. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelsey-v-sargent-ny-1887.