Kelsey v. . Sargent

3 N.E. 795, 100 N.Y. 602, 55 Sickels 602, 1885 N.Y. LEXIS 1019
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 8, 1885·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If the answer is true the plaintiff will be defeated, because the defendant remains liable as guarantor upon certain obligations referred to in that pleading, but not described. It can make no difference whether the matter is left uncertain by general averments constituting an adverse claim, or by allegations of matter effectual only as a defense. In either case the plaintiff might require further information before trial, and whether it should be obtained from a more specific answer, or a bill of particulars, was for the Supreme Court to determine. (Witkowski v. Paramore, 93 N. Y. 467.)

It follows that the appeal should be dismissed.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelsey v. . Sargent, 3 N.E. 795, 100 N.Y. 602, 55 Sickels 602, 1885 N.Y. LEXIS 1019 (N.Y. 1885).

3 N.E. 795 (Kelsey v. . Sargent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Kuster
12 Misc. 2d 239 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1956)
In re the Estate of Herle
157 Misc. 352 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
People v. Gilbert
35 N.Y. Crim. 19 (New York County Courts, 1916)
Posner v. Rosenberg
149 A.D. 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Brewery v. Sieke
146 A.D. 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Capel v. Lyons
22 N.Y.S. 378 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
Ward v. Littlejohn
6 N.Y.S. 170 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
McCarron v. Sire
3 N.Y.S. 659 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1888)
Rice v. Rockefeller
1 N.Y.S. 222 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)