Kelley v. Woodward

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Kelley v. Woodward

58 N.H. 153

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided August 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Foster, J.

The question whether a verdict is contrary to the evidence is a question of fact, to be decided by the judge presiding at the trial. Fuller v. Bailey, ante, p. 71; Lefavor v. Smith, ante, p. 125; Hill v. New Haven, 37 Vt. 501, 512; Clark v. Congregational Society, 45 N. H. 333, 334.

Exception overruled.

Allen, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster, J.

The question whether a verdict is contrary to the evidence is a question of fact, to be decided by the judge presiding at the trial. Fuller v. Bailey, ante, p. 71; Lefavor v. Smith, ante, p. 125; Hill v. New Haven, 37 Vt. 501, 512; Clark v. Congregational Society, 45 N. H. 333, 334.

Exception overruled.

Allen, J., did not sit.

Kelley v. Woodward, 58 N.H. 153 (N.H. 1877).

Pincite

58 N.H. 153 (Kelley v. Woodward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related