Kelley v. Woodward

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Kelley v. Woodward

58 N.H. 153

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedAugust 5, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 58 N.H. 153 (Kelley v. Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelley v. Woodward, 58 N.H. 153 (N.H. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Foster, J.

The question whether a verdict is contrary to the evidence is a question of fact, to be decided by the judge presiding at the trial. Fuller v. Bailey, ante, p. 71; Lefavor v. Smith, ante, p. 125; Hill v. New Haven, 37 Vt. 501, 512; Clark v. Congregational Society, 45 N. H. 333, 334.

Exception overruled.

Allen, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster, J.

The question whether a verdict is contrary to the evidence is a question of fact, to be decided by the judge presiding at the trial. Fuller v. Bailey, ante, p. 71; Lefavor v. Smith, ante, p. 125; Hill v. New Haven, 37 Vt. 501, 512; Clark v. Congregational Society, 45 N. H. 333, 334.

Exception overruled.

Allen, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.H. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-woodward-nh-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack