Little v. Upham
8 A. 823, 64 N.H. 279
This text of 8 A. 823 (Little v. Upham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Little v. Upham, 8 A. 823, 64 N.H. 279 (N.H. 1886).
Opinion
The objection that a verdict is against the evidence presents no question of law. It is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. Fuller v. Bailey, 58 N. H. 71; Lefavor v. Smith, 58 N. H. 125; Kelley v. Woodward, 58 N. H. 153; Hovey v. Brown, 59 N. H. 114.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Flaherty v. Manchester Street Railway
99 A. 89 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1916)
Pitman v. Mauran
40 A. 392 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1897)
Abbott v. Concord & Montreal Railroad
44 A. 912 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1897)
Drown v. Hamilton
44 A. 79 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1894)
Lucier v. Larose
20 A. 249 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1889)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 A. 823, 64 N.H. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-upham-nh-1886.