Little v. Upham
8 A. 823, 64 N.H. 279
Opinion
The objection that a verdict is against the evidence presents no question of law. It is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. Fuller v. Bailey, 58 N. H. 71; Lefavor v. Smith, 58 N. H. 125; Kelley v. Woodward, 58 N. H. 153; Hovey v. Brown, 59 N. H. 114.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Little v. Upham, 8 A. 823, 64 N.H. 279 (N.H. 1886).
8 A. 823 (Little v. Upham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flaherty v. Manchester Street Railway
99 A. 89 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1916)
Pitman v. Mauran
40 A. 392 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1897)
Abbott v. Concord & Montreal Railroad
44 A. 912 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1897)
Drown v. Hamilton
44 A. 79 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1894)
Lucier v. Larose
20 A. 249 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1889)