Keller v. Beckenstein
983 A.2d 274, 294 Conn. 913
This text of 983 A.2d 274 (Keller v. Beckenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Keller v. Beckenstein, 983 A.2d 274, 294 Conn. 913 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
Jonathan M. KELLER et al.
v.
Roz-Lynn BECKENSTEIN et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Richard P. Weinstein, West Hartford and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition.
Michael P. Berman and Suzanne La-Plante, Hartford, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 117 Conn.App. 550, 979 A.2d 1055 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Keller v. Beckenstein
979 A.2d 1055 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
983 A.2d 274, 294 Conn. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-beckenstein-conn-2009.