Keller v. Beckenstein

5 A.3d 486, 298 Conn. 921
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 22, 2010
DocketSC 18689
StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.3d 486 (Keller v. Beckenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keller v. Beckenstein, 5 A.3d 486, 298 Conn. 921 (Colo. 2010).

Opinion

5 A.3d 486 (2010)
298 Conn. 921

Jonathan M. KELLER et al.
v.
Roz-Lynn BECKENSTEIN, Executrix (Estate of Robert J. Beckenstein).

SC 18689

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 22, 2010.

Michael P. Berman and Suzanne La-Plante, Hartford, in support of the cross petition.

Richard P. Weinstein, West Hartford and Nathan A. Schatz, in opposition.

The defendant's cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court. 122 Conn.App. 438, 998 A.2d 838 (2010), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court's dismissal should be vacated?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keller v. Beckenstein
998 A.2d 838 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.3d 486, 298 Conn. 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-beckenstein-conn-2010.