Keesal v. First Healthcare Corp.
This text of 684 So. 2d 214 (Keesal v. First Healthcare Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mindy R. KEESAL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rosalyn R. Barsky, on behalf of the Estate and Mindy R. Keesal, Petitioner,
v.
FIRST HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, d/b/a East Manor Medical Care Center, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Kevin A. McLean, Tampa, for Petitioner.
Thomas Saieva, Tampa, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This court has before it a petition for writ of certiorari which seeks review of a trial court order prohibiting counsel from engaging in ex parte contact with former employees of First Healthcare Corporation, d/b/a East Manor Medical Care Center, who cared for and treated the decedent whose estate is a party to this case. Pursuant to this court's holding in Barfuss v. Diversicare Corp. of America, 656 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), the petition is denied. We certify direct conflict with the holdings of Reynoso v. Greynolds Park Manor, Inc., 659 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), and Estate of Schwartz v. H.B.A. Management, Inc., 673 So.2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Petition denied; direct conflict certified.
PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
684 So. 2d 214, 1996 WL 664771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keesal-v-first-healthcare-corp-fladistctapp-1996.