Henry v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Henry v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc.

696 So. 2d 1223, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 1997 WL 282848

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 30, 1997

DocketNo. 97-00121

StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 1223 (Henry v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., 696 So. 2d 1223, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 1997 WL 282848 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court which prohibited counsel from engaging in ex parte contact with former employees of National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., d/b/a Woodlands Nursing Center, who cared for and treated the decedent whose estate is a party to this case. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion based on this court’s holding in Barfuss v. Diversicare Corp. of America, 656 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), Keesal v. First Healthcare Corp., 684 So.2d 214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), and Wilson v. Central Tampa Nursing Home, Ltd., 691 So.2d 14 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We had certified direct conflict with the holdings of Reynoso v. Greynolds Park Manor, Inc., 659 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), and Estate of Schwartz v. H.B.A. Management, Inc., 673 So.2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Recently, the Florida Supreme Court disapproved Barfuss and held that Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-4.2 does not prohibit “an attorney’s ex parte communications with former employees of a defendant-employer.” H.B.A. Management, Inc. v. Schwartz, 693 So.2d 541, 546 (Fla.1997). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the order prohibiting counsel from engaging in ex parte contact is quashed.

Certiorari granted.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court which prohibited counsel from engaging in ex parte contact with former employees of National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., d/b/a Woodlands Nursing Center, who cared for and treated the decedent whose estate is a party to this case. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion based on this court’s holding in Barfuss v. Diversicare Corp. of America, 656 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), Keesal v. First Healthcare Corp., 684 So.2d 214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), and Wilson v. Central Tampa Nursing Home, Ltd., 691 So.2d 14 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We had certified direct conflict with the holdings of Reynoso v. Greynolds Park Manor, Inc., 659 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), and Estate of Schwartz v. H.B.A. Management, Inc., 673 So.2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Recently, the Florida Supreme Court disapproved Barfuss and held that Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-4.2 does not prohibit “an attorney’s ex parte communications with former employees of a defendant-employer.” H.B.A. Management, Inc. v. Schwartz, 693 So.2d 541, 546 (Fla.1997). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the order prohibiting counsel from engaging in ex parte contact is quashed.

Certiorari granted.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 So. 2d 1223, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 1997 WL 282848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-national-health-care-affiliates-inc-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack