Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. United States of America

81 F.3d 651, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7598, 1996 WL 185928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1996
Docket94-1863
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 81 F.3d 651 (Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. United States of America, 81 F.3d 651, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7598, 1996 WL 185928 (6th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herr v. United States Forest Service
212 F. Supp. 3d 720 (W.D. Michigan, 2016)
United States v. Gabrion
Sixth Circuit, 2008
Stupak-Thrall v. Glickman
Sixth Circuit, 2003
Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel Glickman
346 F.3d 579 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Stupak-Thrall v. Glickman
988 F. Supp. 1055 (W.D. Michigan, 1997)
Stupak-Thrall v. United States
89 F.3d 1269 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 F.3d 651, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7598, 1996 WL 185928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathy-stupak-thrall-v-united-states-of-america-ca6-1996.